762 51 Vs 39

That said, I would prefer AR-15 for mobile and close (<300 yards) and 7.62 x 51 for fixed and longer distances..

762 51 vs 39. Either way, I’ll be hitting that topic eventually, and the reason is becau.. The 7.62×39 cartridge often has a 123 grain bullet loaded to a muzzle velocity of about 2,350 fps.. This is a tangent but also, w/in 200-300 yards, 7.62×39 does pretty much everything 7.62 NATO can do w/ much less weight and recoil and a smaller and lighter platform..

Well, to be honest the 54 is just a bit longer than the 39.. A 7.62×51 M80 cartridge has a 147 grain bullet loaded to a muzzle velocity of 2,800 fps.. I can now report that the IWI Galil ACE in 7.62 NATO is as fascinating a firearm as the original Galil, chambered in a true battle rifle cartridge..

The 7.62×51 NATO or .308 Winchester offers nearly the same ballistics as a .30-06, but in a more compact cartridge.. Bill Here's the very problem with that site and several others just like it that say basically the same thing;. The 39 is generally used in the AK-47, and the such..

And 5.56 NATO, there is a similar set of rules between the .308 Win.. The clear answer is BOTH.. They are two completely different rounds with different bullet sizes, casing shapes, and powder charges..

The 5.56 is faster and is a smaller round.. .308 Winchester and 7.62x51 NATO are the same thing, that's why you keep hearing things about.308 when you're looking for 7.62x51.. I've been wanting to pick up an AK-pattern rifle for a while now, but I don't shoot very often..

The difference between .308 and 7.62×51 is a fun conversation to have.. The complete dimensions of each case can be seen there.. The 7.62×39 Ruski was established towards the end of WWII by the Russian government in 1944..

Mel Glass, May 19, 2016 #1.. Within the Ammunition forums, part of the M14 M1A Forum category;. 4/23/2014 4:39:35 AM EDT At 300 yards, i'd say 5.56 is still more than sufficient really..

Another risk factor is using 7.62 ammo with a .308 chamber.. We shot from a concrete bench at targets at 100 meters (109 yards), utilizing Bullseye Camera Systems’ AmmoCam Long Range Edition to keep eyes on the targets.. The R designates that it is a rimmed cartridge, just like the..

Thank You, Semper Fi -- Lou M.. Just as we discussed the relationship between the .223 Rem.. 222 Remington Load Data.

Interesting view AMMUNITION, RELOADING 7.62X51 VS.. This gives it a substantially lower muzzle energy of 1,508 ft lbs.. The 7.62 part is nominal diameter in millimeters of the bullet..

' The most commonly-cited explanation .. The 7.62×51mm NATO (official NATO nomenclature 7.62 NATO) is a rimless bottlenecked rifle cartridge developed in the 1950s as a standard for small arms among NATO countries.. And the 7.62 NATO.It’s more than just a military designation ..

The 5.56 NATO rounds lose between 40-50″ while the 7.62×39 rounds drop 90-100″.. This gives it a muzzle energy of 2,559 ft lbs.. We carry a large selection of .308 Winchester and 7.62x51 NATO ammunition from all of the top manufacturers that modern users demand..

Which Is Right For You?. You may have to register before you can post:. But even as I reviewed it, I was intrigued by the idea of testing the same gun chambered in the larger 7.62×51 NATO caliber..

The 39, 51, and 54 are the nominal lengths of the cases in millimeters.. Ballistics Match of Tortoise and the Hare - Pew .. The 7.62×39mm (aka 7.62 Soviet or formerly .30 Russian Short) round is a rimless bottlenecked intermediate cartridge of Soviet origin that was designed during World War II..

It was designed to be an intermediate range cartridge and gained a lot of traction once the Russian government designed the AK-47 and put it into military use.. It's comparable to the .30-06 .. 7.62 — 300 Blackout – A Viable Alternative?.

If you want to be safe then only use 7.62 cartridges in a 7.62 rifle and .308 cartridges in a .308 rifle.. From an external dimension standpoint, the .308 Winchester cartridge case and the 7.62 NATO (7.62 x 51 mm) are the same thing.. The only thing you may run into with 7.62 x 39 is when you shoot the Russian ammo, it does have deeper seated primers..

In recent years, we’ve seen the 300 Blackout (7.62 x 35) come on the scene…as we talk 5.56 vs.. It is sometimes confused with the similarly named Russian 7.62×54mmR cartridge, a slightly longer, rimmed cartridge... 7.62 X 51 cartridge vs..

TriggerTimeTV shared a fantastic graphic showcasing the difference between the .308 and military-standard 7.62×51 cartridges.. 7.62×39 It’s also generally accepted that the 7.62 NATO is flatter trajectory.. Basically, if you consider the .30-30 Winchester adequate for the job, then the 7.62×39 should also do just fine in the same situation..

Look them up on Wikipedia.. The 7.62 can penetrate hard targets much easier and more accurately.. I was impressed by the IWI Galil ACE in 7.62×39 I reviewed last year..

Debating between the 7.62x39 mm and .300 Blackout for your next AR (or upper) purchase?. Now if you are just going to use a factory 7.62 x 39 round, then the Tula soft-points would be my choice.. Ammunition 7.62×51 mm NATO was introduced by US in the M40 rifle at the end of the 50s, and although today it is still used in other rifles like M240 or the M60..

Definitely concur w/ the premise of this article, but you really need to run the 150+ gr 7.62×39 loads to match .30-30 performance.. It was introduced in U.S.. $39.89 QuickView Wolf Military Classic 7.62x39mm Ammunition 20 Rounds 124 Grain Bi-Metal FMJ Stee..

Full graphic is below and click on it to be taken to TriggerTimeTV on Facebook.. 7.62 x 51, I’m very curious about your opinion of that cartridge.. Two of the Most Popular Bullets Compared › State Your Case:.

Tactical Hog Eradication on Factory 7.62 x 39 for Hog Hunting.. A right should restrict the government, not obligate it!. In my opinion and experience, the X40 will outperform the X39 100% of the time with regards to accuracy, bullet selection for reloading (.308 vs..

I think they make a 154 soft point and a 123 grain.. If what you are hunting can be handled by these, the 7.62 x 39 is a good hunting round.. Wolf Military Classic 7.62x39mm Ammunition 20 Roun..

I don’t think I need a .308 autoloader, though I do crave the Grendel.. Trajectory of 7.62×51 vs.. Either of those will basically do anything the .308 will..

Lastly, the 7.62×39 mm requires the use of unique, non-interchangeable parts that take into account the cartridge’s larger size.. I also own and shoot 5.45x39 and 7.62x39 AR uppers.. Again, this may or may not be an issue for you..

Nearly all 7.62 x 39 ammo is 123-125 grains and the choices are generally fmj or jhp.. The .308’s “No-Go” dimension is 1.634″ vs.. I hope by now that most folks do know there is a difference between 5.56 NATO and .223 Remington..

Especially if you reload your ammo you will appreciate the 30-30s versatility.. It is America's love of, rather than fear of .. The 7.62×51 was first created to increase the effectiveness of the M1 Garand 30-06 model of that time..

It was the modified version of 300 Savage which was called by T65.. However, the 7.62×39 and 7.62×54 both have the same bullet diameter.. This is a significant bullet drop for both rounds, but the 7.62×39 is much more pronounced and will be a major factor in applications for these two cartridges..

The 54 (as I said earlier) is just a bit longer.. When you need a hard-hitting round, there are few better choices than .308 Winchester.. 1.6405″ for a 7.62×51 “No Go” gauge..

Finally, while all three are standardized by the Permanent International Commission for the Proof of Small Arms (better known as CIP), only the 7.62×39 and .308 Winchester are also SAAMI cartridges.. The NATO version of the 7.62 would be the 7.62 x 51 and is also known as the .308.. Pressure and velocity are also shown..

At that distance, we were hardly stretching its transmission capabilities, but it worked perfectly.. Are y'all finding the 6.8 is a big step up for the 7.62x39 when it comes to big hogs and one shot stopping?. 17 Remington Load Data;.

The 7.62 x 51 mm can be thicker, and the .308 is loaded to a higher pressure, but there isn’t much difference between cartridges outside of this.. Our Low Price $9.89 QuickView Wolf Performance 7.62x39 Ammunition 122 Grain Bi-Metal FMJ Steel Case 2362 fps Wolf Performance 7.62x39 Ammunition 122 Grain Bi-M.. I have 5.56 and 7.62×39 autoloaders, along with bolt actions in .270 and 7.62X54R..

7.62mm NATO - The Truth About Guns › 5.56 vs 7.62x39mm:. This is a discussion on 7.62 X 51 cartridge vs.. The 12.5 should outperform the 7.62 with the speeds I have been seeing people get.I will be putting my spec war on it and thermal when I get one..

Let’s state some obvious facts;. Clint McKee of Fulton Armory notes:. We will take a look at this idea in this cartridge comparison article over the 7.62×39 vs .308..

.308 vs 7.62×51 Ammunition.. Today, we are gonna show you some of the differences that will help you to clear up the confusion.. Yes, we know that most might wonder why not compare the 7.62×51 NATO round instead of the .308 (the civilian version of the 7.62×51)..

It drops almost two feet after 300.. The 5.56 can cause collateral damage to a soft target (flesh) while the 7.62 will simply punch a hole.. “[N]obody makes 7.62mm (NATO) ammo that isn’t to the .308 ..

Although not identical, the 7.62×51mm NATO and the commercial .308 Winchester cartridges are similar enough that they can be loaded into rifles chambered for the other round, but the Winchester .308 cartridges are typically loaded to higher pressures than 7.62×51mm NATO cartridges.. The 7.62 has higher muzzle energy and is a larger round.. When zeroed in to 100 yards, the same 7.62 Soviet cartridge that we discussed above drops 6.5 inches after 200 yards..

Additionally, the 7.62×51/.308 Winchester and 7.62×39 are rimless cartridges while the 7.62x54R is a rimmed cartridge.. I am a huge fan of the 7.62x40, owning & shooting several.. In the end, the 7.62×39 mm and .300 Blackout cartridges are best characterized by the title of a well-known children’s book, “Same, Same but Different.”.

The impossibility of using that caliber in some countries and a nimble commercial market facilitated the development of a new caliber, this is how Winchester launched the .308 caliber .. 204 Ruger Load Data;. Out at 500 yards, there is at most 50″ of difference between the two..

7.62 NATO, as far as accuracy, and range, the bullets seem to be awefully close, but the powder in the casings, is the difference, along with the casing.. No, 7.62x51/.308 and 7.62x39 are in no way interchangable.. In fact, the 7.62 was developed using the general design of the .308 as its ‘parent’ case..

Here are some things to consider before parting with your cash.. Roughly comparable to the .30-30 Winchester in terms of power, the 7.62x39mm is well suited for hunting medium sized game at short to medium range.. 32 acp or .38 Super..

7.62×51mm NATO vs .308 Winchester 7.62×51mm NATO and the commercial .308 Winchester.. They fill two very different roles.. 5.45 x 39 mm VS 7.62×39mm availability in 10 years With Classic Firearms extending their AK deals through payday, I'm considering picking up that sweet looking DDI AK-74..

Repeal the 17th Amendment.. Click the register link above to proceed.. Due to the worldwide proliferation of the Soviet SKS and AK-47 pattern rifles, as well as RPD and RPK light machine guns, the cartridge is used by both militaries and ..

The difference between the two, beyond the outside dimensions, is basically two-fold:. SEPTEMBER 16, 2016 MIDSOUTH SHOOTERS 1 COMMENT By Glen Zediker:. 7.62x51 vs 7.62x39 If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above..

As for your question:. 22 Hornet Load Data;. Can anyone tell me the difference between the 7mm Rem..

While some shooters understand that .308 (the civilian standard) is actually more powerful than its military cousin, few likely know the actual differences between the cartirdges.. First, let's start this discussion with a comparison between the 7.62×51 NATO cartridge and its civilian counterpart, the .308 Winchester.. Any reason to prefer it over 5.56, or is 5.56 still what you’d recommend for most people?.

221 Remington Fireball Load Data;.